Michael O'Bernicia How revealing that my most vocal detractors are claiming that the PCP has no legitimacy and that I'm making it all up. I wonder what the Chief Magistrate will make of that, when the warrant application is processed on Monday.
Of course I understand that some people need to see proof before they will believe that the criminal action is real. However, unlike my detractors, I don't make public statements which are not sustained by the facts.
Those who have followed and understood my work over the past twelve years have no such doubts, as they have seen me pull the following rabbits out of various hats over the years:
1. The common law remedy for refusing to register a birth.
2. The common law remedy for cancelling registration as a taxpayer.
3. The common law remedy for getting rid of fraudulent loans and credit cards.
4. The common law remedy for revoking consent to be governed by criminal governments.
5. The statutory remedy to get rid of fraudulent mortgages.
6. An international treaty which created a government free jurisdiction, under international law.
7. The statutory remedy for cancelling fraudulent mortgages in the charges register.
8. Magna Carta 2020 - Declaration of Rights, which a properly convened Grand Jury declared to be sufficient to restore the common law.
Anybody who has diligently read through the related posts on my blog knows I have a 100% track record in and out of court, simply because I establish the correct argument from the start and I then stand my ground until my adversaries either lose or concede.
Considering Simon Dolan has admitted privately that he didn't know that PCP's are possible before today, it speaks volumes that he has since neglected to delete his dishonest statements about the case on Twitter.
As for Bitchie Allen [whose head is so far up Simon's arse I am mystified he can still breathe], as he has often said himself, who the fuck gives a shit what he thinks? His content is nothing without interesting guests.
However, without those guests being able to trust that he will not have them on his show, only to slag them off at a later date, nobody worth listening to will agree to appear on it, as soon as the word gets round that that is exactly what he did to me.
Nevertheless, in the event they both publicly apologize unreservedly for their wrongdoings, retracting their statements without further discussion, I won't hold them both personally liable for attempting to defame my character, by falsely claiming [some would say maliciously] that my statements about the PCP are untrue.
Imagine how their followers are going to roast them on social media, when the proof of our exchange with the chief magistrate is revealed next week.
Not to mention the inevitable announcement that the application has been administered, when the arrest warrant will either be issued forthwith, or the Director of Public Prosecutions will step in to present the case, on the ground that is a matter of such public importance.
In other words, we are already over the highest legal hurdles in getting the arrest warrant issued at the earliest opportunity and the DPP is unlikely to want to be the one who runs the case against a government minister. Especially when he is banged to rights on the evidence we have already filed.
So if those two misguided souls are willing to man up and admit that that have done wrong, we can ask them to explain why they neglected to perform a simple internet search for 'UK law of private criminal prosecutions'.
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/p ... osecutions
Real journalist or controlled opposition?
The answer will be revealed by his response to this effortless exposure of the quicksand he and Dolan are standing upon.
