PLD Get's It's Ass Handed To It At Alberta's Queen's Bench

[hucknallred]

In other words the court is contemplating declaring Jacquie a vexatious litigant.

Is it possible in Canadian Law that she can be ordered to stay off social media? She vanished, then came back citing "family issues" & is now well & truly off the radar.

I am ok I had an issue with my Facebook account. I will need to take some time off to deal with some very important issues with my family but I am ok and I will be back online as soon as I possibly can.

[Burnaby49]

Don't know as an overall general rule but I doubt it. I think the exceptions are;

1 - If she's charged with something it can be made part of her bail terms.

2 - If convicted of an offense and she has been granted parole or if she gets a conditional sentence (serves jail time at home) a prohibition on social media can be part of the terms.

[eric]

Is it possible in Canadian Law that she can be ordered to stay off social media? She vanished, then came back citing "family issues" & is now well & truly off the radar.

I am ok I had an issue with my Facebook account. I will need to take some time off to deal with some very important issues with my family but I am ok and I will be back online as soon as I possibly can.

Sorry to dash your hopes but she had indicated in advance what dates she would be absent. Remember she is on AISH and had also said she had dental issues. These dates exactly correspond to AISH payment date, possible changes to AADL coverage, and as a bonus her GST rebate payment. Translation for non Canadians and in particular non Albertans - she has about $1800 in her pocket, potentially expanded medical coverage, and hopefully wants to spend it to clear up some personal and medical issues. Of course this is all assuming she has her wits about her.

[Burnaby49]

Jacquie's back in action!

Attention group members. We have the regime scared and on the run. That means that they are trying to turn up the heat on us. Never back down, even if they turn up the heat. They use intimidation tactics and fear to control us. If you back down when they start to intimidate you then, they win. I thought people would have learned from what happened to Joel Viau but apparently not, as we have another group member that is about to make the same mistake only with a lot more to lose. It won't just be prison time, it will be the lose of a child.

2 people have been brought into this case and they will need to continue forward with the process regardless of what the mother does.

However she will not have Protection if she shows any sign of weakness, the regime WILL pounce and use the opportunity to make an example out her to try and sway others away from the Remedy.

We can't allow this to be a setback from the movement, so stay strong and lose the fear. We are stronger together.

We are quickly getting the groundwork done for building seizures so good work we are getting closer to Redress

https://www.facebook.com/groups/7543384 ... 862377568/

we've discussed Joel Viau here;

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtop ... 13#p285813

A thought came to mind with this comment;

we have another group member that is about to make the same mistake only with a lot more to lose. It won't just be prison time, it will be the lose of a child.

Would that member be MHVB, the woman that Jacquie tried to represent in the case that started this discussion?

AVI v MHVB
2020 ABQB 489
https://www.albertacourts.ca/docs/defau ... 54b39380_2

And the answer is yes. This from the comments to the above posting;

Jacquie Phoenix
She fled to the USA with the child, I was helping her beat the charges and fight for custody of her daughter. They are using their fake court orders to intimidate her and she is falling for it instead of doing what is necessary to help me with this battle. It's all fear that is what they use to control people. Article 61 does protect our children.

Jacquie regrets getting involved with such a cowardly litigant in the first place;

Jacquie Phoenix
It is the custody case that got me attacked by the National Post. I am not very impressed by this bs, I told her going in that this was going to be a hard fight and that the Regime was going to lash out, If I would have known that she would go running scared at the first attack by the regime I never would have taken the case and tried to help her. Live and Learn.

But, undaunted, Jacquie promises she'll get her ass kicked yet again;

Jacquie Phoenix
well I still have to hold the Criminals from the fake courts accountable for the Treason they committed against me but I will have no way to protect her or rescue the child. I am still helping other parents who are fighting for custody of their children. So I keep moving forward no matter what. Chances are there will be another media attack against me but I can handle it lol I don't back down from the Regime.

So, after being ordered by Queen's Bench to stop being a fake lawyer, she appears to be still acting as one.

Jacquie gets entangled in animal similes;

Jacquie Phoenix
Yes, once you know the truth it is very empowering. We are always telling people to lose the fear. The regime is scared and it shows, but we have to remain strong when they react like a cornered rat because if we show fear or back off they will take that as a sign of weakness and they will pounce like a rabid dog.

Her followers are as crazy as bedbugs too;

Deborah Arc Almond
Yes your so right Absolutely stay strong.
Don't be intimidated at all.
I hope she doesn't back down And finds her inner light and strength

Casual shop in Homebase for me today to pick up a plant
Police community service officer stopped me as I was walking through the store for not wearing a mask.
He continued to harrass me and said I was committing a "crime' for not wearing a mask.
I quoted and informed him that I have put his chief inspector on Notice of my lawful standing and that he was harassing me. and that I wasn't committing any crime!
Then I got hurled abuse from a customer passing by as the PCSO continued to harass me. The store manager looking on at his side saying nothing

Will now send him the 5 notice process
He refused to give his name. I have his badge number .
Logged it with the police as he was harassing me. Got a log number for harassment against me

Raised a complaint with Homebase head office as the manager just watched a customer projecting abusive non mask wearing comments at me before asking him to walk away and then continued to watch the PCSO continue to threaten me with a fine

It ended up me walking away raising the complaint at the customer service

The police refused to give his name so I'm assuming I can use is badge number to send the notices to him.

Im now investing in a body cam because I seem to getting stopped a lot
But I refuse to be threatened & imtimidated
Stay strong family and lots of love to you all

This won't end well for Jacquie but it will be entertaining.

[wserra]

[Foggy]

Im now investing in a body cam ...

Masks are virtually free now. I voted early in North Carolina on Sunday and they were handing out free masks if you didn't have one (I did).

She won't wear a free mask, but she'll invest in a body camera so she can film people telling her to wear a free mask.

Awesomeness.

[eric]

Although we have a disproportional share of anti-maskers here in Alberta our "socialist" medical system came through in the crunch. Last year, even before any hints of a zombie virus, they started buying up enough PPE to last though normal usage to the end of its shelf life. They figured they could always sell it if they had a surplus. The result was there is a veritable glut of free masks here. They restored my faith in the fact that professional civil servants can at times be efficient this summer - they gave out 40 million free masks. Rather than fill out a form proving you lived in the province for generations or go somewhere to pick up your 5 pack of masks it was simple. They just told major fast food chains to pick them up at a government warehouse. No more "would you like fries with that?" - here's some masks to go with your morning timmies or happy meal. Last time I checked I have ten to fifteen masks in each of my vehicles.

[grixit]

I bought a 25 pack of cheap flimsy ones, 4 small stretchy ones from Walmart, and 5 larger handmade ones from an acquaintance who had been about to start a new job when lockdown happened. I keep 3 in my truck and one in my bag for those times when i go into a store and suddenly realize i forgot to put one on. Still trying to burn that in as a habit.

Why doesn't someone tell the sovs that they foil face recognition, make it harder for drones to knock you out with gas, and if you wear one with The Elder Sign printed on it, it will force any space lizard or Illuminati agent to flee?

[Burnaby49]

And The Donald gets in the picture!

Jacquie has posted another video, an interview with some British guy called Charlie Ward;

https://www.facebook.com/jacqueline.rob ... 3080162180

Charlie’s a big Trump fan, The Donald is going to save us all if we just let him. But Jacquie doesn’t want to have a discussion on Trump that distracts from the Article 61 remedy for all of Canada’s (and the UK’s) problems. This pro-Trump, forget about Trump conflict dominated the video.

First Charlie, as a Trumpoholic, says he’s looking forward to the third of November, presumably because of his belief that Trump will win. Jacquie’s not happy with that. Not, as far as I can tell, because she’s anti-Trump but because The Donald has nothing to do with Article 61 and in her world anything else is just background noise. When he mentioned November 3rd she laughed like an idiot making me suspect that she was drunk again. Apparently not, it was just Jacquie being Jacquie. She said that the American election was “nothing but a Roman circus meant to distract us”. She sure puts you American in your place. Arguably the most contentious presidential election in US history, a contest watched with fascination by most of the world, is nothing more than a false flag to keep our minds off the real threat to the Powers-That-Be, Lord Nitwit’s invoking Article 61 on March 23, 2001!

According to Chrlie Donald Trump is determined to get us away from maritime law but his associates, purporting to be his friends, are doing their best to sabotage him. Bastards!!! But Jacquie doesn’t trust any politician, they’re all corrupt.

No doubt all you ill-informed ignoramuses are asking yourselves what the US election and Donald Trump have to do with Article 61 since, if it has any application to anything, as a British law (before Britain as we know it existed), it would only apply to countries with governments based on the UK monarchy like we Canadians suffering under the yoke of the Queen’s tyranny. That’s because you don’t have Jacquie’s depth of knowledge of international law. She implied that Article 61 applies to all governments world-wide. You’re on notice Kim Jong-un!

Charlie countered this by saying that Trump wasn’t a politician, he was a business man. An arguable point given the information released by the New York Times about his disastrous history of business ventures but, in any case, inconsequential to Jacquie since Donald is supporting the “fake king”. Not surprisingly this comment confused Charlie, “What fake king?” ‘Greg Hallett’ was Jacquie’s response. Frankly the answer came right out of left field as far as I was concerned and left me as confused as Charlie. Who the fuck is that I asked myself. I did a name check on Quatloos and found only a mention in passing of no consequence. So I googled it. He’s this guy, a New Zealander with pretensions of grandeur;

https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/2020/09/ ... he-throne/

He’s the Mashiach-Christ-Messiah King of England along with being the king of Canada and just about everywhere else. This article gives the connection to Donald Trump;

Hallett’s audience is heavily dominated by adherents of QAnon, who believe that his ascension to throne will work in tandem with the role of Donald Trump in the USA, both working towards the defeat of an all-powerful Satanic cabal that has ruled the world for centuries. The British Royal Family, they believe, are part of this cabal, and have either been arrested or executed already.

Old Liz has been executed and Greg’s in charge? I’d say these are pretty deep waters for a purple-haired loon living on public assistance in northern Alberta to swim in and we’re only at the 5:24 point of a 40 minute interview!

According to Jacquie the Queen was deposed in March 2001 when article 61 was invoked and the Crown has been vacant since. Back in the day when the Barons wrote Article 61 into the Magna Carta invoking it would have just triggered a call for troops to have an actual armed rebellion, they would still have had to do the risky heavy-lifting of actually kicking King John off the throne. But today all it apparently takes is a few Barons writing the Queen a polite letter and the job’s done and she’s gone. A Pretty sweet deal I’d say.

Jacquie went through a laundry-list of requirements necessary to get another monarch culminating in a constitutional convention where we’d all vote on one. Charlie said “If we even need one”. Jacquie wasn’t putting up with such foolish talk. The “common law justice system” is a “perfect system” but it needs a monarch to get it up and running. Charlie said that he agreed that Hallett was a fake monarch but he said that he played an important role in making people, apparently for the first time ever, question the role of the British monarchy. Thanks to Donald people are seeing the truth about the monarchy because, when he met her for the first time, he walked in front of her, a breach of royal protocol. I’d say that this was just boorish behavior but I apparently know nothing about what’s really going on because the real reason was that she’d already been deposed at that time and Donald knew this. Pushing the Queen aside was “hugely significant” because it showed that Donald was aware she was deposed and was pointing this out to everyone

Charlie and Jacquie got into a bit of a squabble about the significance of Donald’s behavior that I really couldn’t be bothered to try and follow. Basically Charlie’s point seemed to be that Trump was now the driving force making the world aware of Article 61 but Jacquie thought Trump, at best, irrelevant, at worst yet another traitor. Charlie went off in a rant about the “Covid fraud” and how Trump was using it to expose the deep state. Jacquie, as blindsided as I was about all this Trump worship, told Charlie she hadn’t expected to discuss Trump when she agreed to be interviewed “I thought you were asking me on here to talk about Article 61 and Practical Law Dissent . . . . . in the UK and Commonwealth”. Charlie wasn’t having any of that. He claimed he had no agenda, he wanted an open discussion, but then he immediately said that he was in favour of moving from maritime law to common law and that Donald Trump was too and was trying to do this but he couldn’t do it until he had “control of both houses”. Charlie seems a little obsessed about The Donald. Not that Jacquie was any less focused about article 61.

Jacquie said that her little group was a beehive of activity and the government was “in an uproar” about it. But Charlie was a touch pessimistic because she was “up against Justin Trudeau who was deep, deep, deep, state”. But Jacquie had already checkmated Trudeau by putting him on notice. As a result “We have them on the run, they’re scared of what’s going on”. All that mockery that Jacquie has received from the press (all in prior post) was really a government disinformation campaign. People are taking the oath everywhere! Then Charlie was back on his Trump and maritime law obsession yet again. We seem to have on of history’s great bromances here. Jacquie tried to trump this (a bridge reference not a stupid pun) by saying that Article 61 was “currently the only law in effect throughout the commonwealth realm”. It also covers independent nations once ruled by Britain which is why the American Declaration of independence is null and void. That’s a new shift in Jacquie’s attempt to rule the world. She’s already cancelled Canada’s courts and government now she has you Americans in her sights! How does she know its void. Because it’s a treasonably written document. The proof is right in front of you Americans and you’re too dense to see it. It’s all because of the inclusion of the second amendment. Since we all have the right to defend ourselves the Constitution didn’t need a second amendment specifically saying this. Putting the amendment in deliberately voided it because it made the entire Constitution treasonous. It’s past two in the morning and I’m getting too tired to make a lot of sense out of this brilliant legal analysis.

Charlie’s response was Wow! Mine too! Jacquie went on to say that all of America’s laws and regulations are common law crimes and, as a result, are also all null and void and America has no government. British Columbia is noted for the potency of our marijuana but I’ll have whatever Jacquie is growing in northern Alberta.

Jacquie said that Trump has no power and, by pretending to be president, is guilty of treason against the people. I suppose a logical conclusion if there is no government. She said that power resided in the hands of the people. Sounds a little Commie to me. Charlie of course went off on his liturgy about Trump and maritime law yet again but was cut off by Jacquie who told him Article 61 has already done that because it’s an unstoppable force designed to win. Those Barons knew what they were doing 800 years ago!

Then she said the UK had to bring back the Bradbury pound;

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... _Pound.pdf

I’ve no idea where she’s going anymore. I probably shouldn’t have had that second beer if I had any expectation of being able to follow such complex legal issues. Charlie asked her if she didn’t think Trump was on her side and she said that it was a pretty little show but was just the two wings of the same bird. I’m almost certain I only had two beers but I generally need at least six to be so befuddled. Charlie disagreed with whatever the fuck she meant. They squabbled back and forth with Charlie trying to get Jacquie onside with his trump obsession and Jacquie trying to overpower that with her equally demented Article 61 craziness. Trump didn’t matter anyhow in Jacquie’s world because every American who votes is committing treason. Charlie thought this a “very interesting point”. Jacquie had been very composed to this point but she started her idiotic laugh whenever she spoke, a sign she’s losing it. If Trump walked in front of the Queen because she’s been deposed he should have told the people “instead of playing his game”. Since he didn’t he’s untrustworthy. She said she’d use an analogy. “You can’t destroy the corpus juris with the corpus juris any more than you can melt an iceberg with an ice cube”. That’s a quote. Charlie just quietly said “ok”. By this point they were squabbling like my two sons when they were three and making about as much sense. Trump this, Article 61 that.

Then Jacquie was on about the courts. Seize the courthouses! Throw out the judges! Put conveeners in their place and have the jury decide by jury nullification! If one juror employs juror nullification the entire statute the defendant is being prosecuted with is null and void “Jury nullification is the big one. Charlie responded with a long loud incoherent Trump rant I’m not going to bother relating. I have to confess I haven’t being paying a lot of attention for the last ten minutes, I’ve been reading news while I listen but “maritime law” “Trump” “common law” “Article 61” bubble to the surface once in a while. Three minutes left, it’s finally winding down. Poor old Charlie says he’s been kicked off Facebook and YouTube but he still has a following. It ended with Charlie saying they needed the sledgehammer of Donald Trump to end maritime law and Jacquie saying we had to invoke Article 61 while laughing wildly.

[eric]

Charlie’s response was Wow! Mine too! Jacquie went on to say that all of America’s laws and regulations are common law crimes and, as a result, are also all null and void and America has no government. British Columbia is noted for the potency of our marijuana but I’ll have whatever Jacquie is growing in northern Alberta.

The endless winter damp where Burnaby49 resides must be affecting his mental acuity. Northern Alberta is the home of moose, muskeg, and itinerant Newfoundlanders wondering what happened to their jobs in the oil and gas sector. As I have previously mentioned, Jacquie (and also the people who witnessed her paperwork) resides about 20 minutes from me in south-central Alberta. I was in her village about a week ago and in the space of twenty minutes three different people stopped and chatted with me and a homeowner about my horseradish harvesting efforts.

[Burnaby49]

I live less than 25 miles north of the American border. Everywhere in Alberta is in the far north as far as I'm concerned regardless of any geographical definitions you can offer.

Our traditional "endless winter damp" has not yet started. We generally expect that in a week or two when November hits then we're generally facing Noah's climactic issues until March or so. Overall we've had quite a pleasant autumn.

No need to question my mental acuity. I already did that quite voluntarily in my prior posting where I admitted a number of times that Jacquie's brilliant analysis totally confounded me. She and Charlie were debating on a level far above my pathetically limited analytical abilities.

[HardyW]

And The Donald gets in the picture!

Jacquie has posted another video, an interview with some British guy called Charlie Ward;

https://www.facebook.com/jacqueline.rob ... 3080162180

Charlie’s a big Trump fan, The Donald is going to save us all if we just let him.

Charlie Ward is a new bigshot guru in the Iraqi Dinar community, since a few months ago. And of course he has a great CV which explains his great inside knowledge which he selectively shares with said community.

Charlie Ward has worked and been friends with the Chinese Elders for over 15 years. He was highly trusted in the financial world and moved money around the globe for private clients ranging from the super-rich to different global governments. This past year his team moved US gold out of the Vatican back to Fort Knox and other US Treasury locations. He was presently moving monies, gold and valuables for countries and individuals in the Global Currency Reset. A lot of Ward’s info came from what he called the Four Walls of Power, which included the Chinese Elders, Alliance, Trump White House and Trump Redemption Team. He has been under a Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) for the last two months and told what he could and could not reveal.

and

According to Charlie Ward President Trump and the Alliance have taken down the thirteen Illuminati families in Venice Italy, retrieved the US gold from the Vatican, placed the Federal Reserve and IRS under the new US Treasury and was defeating the Cabal, which controlled political parties worldwide. The first ten days of November would be very important.

[grixit]

Trump Season!

61 Season!

[Arthur Rubin]

Trump Season!

61 Season!

Duck Season!

Rabbit Season!

[Burnaby49]

Trump Season!

61 Season!

Duck Season!

Rabbit Season!

Wabbit season!

[Hercule Parrot]

According to Charlie Ward President Trump and the Alliance have taken down the thirteen Illuminati families in Venice Italy, retrieved the US gold from the Vatican, placed the Federal Reserve and IRS under the new US Treasury and was defeating the Cabal, which controlled political parties worldwide. The first ten days of November would be very important.

And they certainly were. It seems that the thirteen Illuminati families, aided by the American voters, have put a stop to all of this. I guess that means the lizard freemasons are back, huh?

[Pottapaug1938]

"Charlie Ward is a new bigshot guru in the Iraqi Dinar community, since a few months ago."

Sooooooo. I guess that we can await a new round of conversations such as:

"Joseph, when are we going to get those dinars of yours transformed into millions of dollars, like you promised me would happen? I didn't give you my life savings so that I could have my apartment cluttered with all these piles of Iraqi money."

"Gee, Ma -- be patient! Charlie Ward promised us all that the RV will happen any day now, as soon as the White Knights convince the Chinese bankers to put those planeloads of gold in that Saudi vault, and the President of the World Bank tells us who put the bomp in the bomp-ba-bomp-ba-bomp."

[Burnaby49]

Gee, Ma -- be patient! Charlie Ward promised us all that the RV will happen any day now, as soon as the White Knights convince the Chinese bankers to put those planeloads of gold in that Saudi vault, and the President of the World Bank tells us who put the bomp in the bomp-ba-bomp-ba-bomp.

Sometimes I despair at how you people are such absolute suckers for any and all internet disinformation campaigns.

"who put the bomp in the bomp-ba-bomp-bap-bomp"? That's just an old internet red herring promulgated to distract you from the real issue. The real question the President of the World Bank must answer is 'why is the Rama in the Rama Lama Ding Dong?'.

The information's out there if you do your research.

[grixit]

I'll go ask my friend, the witchdoctor.

[Burnaby49]

And here's your chance to get rid of Jacquie! Buy her a plane ticket out of Canada;

https://www.gofundme.com/f/david-amp-jacquie

But I can see a few problems looming. Jacquie adamantly refuses to wear a mask, that's going to be an issue at the gate, if she even gets that far. And I doubt she has a passport, that sign of slavery to a treasonous government. She'd also be required to quarantine on arrival even if they are letting people in. Add on the fact that an actual funeral in Britain is problematic given their current Covid lockdown and she's going to be facing some challenges. But not as many as Dave's hypothetical funeral is currently having given the dismal state of the fund opened up to pay for it;

https://www.gofundme.com/f/5wdx2e-david ... ial-fund