The video contains the usual guff

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Turning up in court for the repossession hearing and then posting online the eviction date does seem to indicate that you may be into something!
I only skimmed but this was a good exchange with the lady rozzer.
So, how was she released within 30 minutes when it took 30 minutes for a nurse to arrive?Ved Chaudhari was live wrote: Neelu Berry's home 450 New North Road Hainault was stolen by Lloyds Banking Group, Bank of Scotland trading as Halifax at 1pm on 19m October 2022
Police aided and abetted the theft by unidentified burglars with no production of any valid instruments or authority to do so.
Neelu and Michael Melchizedek Moor were arrested and taken to Freshwharf in Barking Essex
Neelu suffered shortness of breath and chest pains on arrival.
She asked to see the nurse 4 times in 30 minutes, before being seen and found with a rocketed blood pressure of 210 / 120 Lisel Daniel ???
The Sergeant asked the officers for a copy of warrant which the officers did not have
Both officers became aware that their inability to provide the criminal charge brought against Neelu Berry and Michael Melchizedek in the absence of a copy of the warrant made the arrest a kidnap.
As Both officers did not identify any grounds for the kidnap the Sergeant released both Neelu and Michael within 30 minutes of arrival.
The nurse was adamant that Neelu must be driven to the Accident and emergency by Police. She and Michael were taken in a marked Police car to A & E at King George Hospital
The Police officers checked that the bailiffs had finished sealing all the windows with metal shutters at the stolen house, and were about to leave, at the time Neetu and Michael were released.
Looks like the council have determined that she is intentionally homeless and they have no obligation to house her. It'll be interesting to see if any of her few devoted fans offer to have the delusional nutcase in their home.Dear Free Human Rights Advocates,
The council has decided, on the basis of the Met Police Nurse report yesterday, to provide me 8 days stay at a Travelodge hotel, in Ilford, until 28 October, pending my request for a second opinion from a medical doctor, that contrary to the Council's assessment, I am entitled to emergency accommodation under Section 188.
When Michael Melchizedek Moor and I arrived at Barking Police compound in freshWharf, at 3pm on 19th October 2022, the sergeant asked the arresting officers for the warrant, (which the bailiffs would have had to serve on me and the police, to legitimise the eviction); which the 2 officers were unable to produce; The sergeant then asked them what we were arrested for if there was no warrant to back the eviction. The officers seemed bemused.
The sergeant then said we could not be logged into the system if no crime was proven against us in the absence of a warrant to break entry, so the sergeant released us upon arrival to the police station because there was no warrant to authorise our arrest. This means that the sergeant admits that it is an illegal eviction.
Please feel free to demand that the house must be returned immediately on grounds of Contempt of Court, court Administration and Law in the Police failure to ascertain the existence of a valid Warrant.
I.
CAD 3206 260922 5 men on 26th September First Eviction attempt
Ii.
CAD 3247 191022 7 men, 19th October Second Eviction attempt
A) 2 older bailiffs caught on CCTV on 12 Sept, 26 Sept & 03 October
B) 5 Young lads below age 35, locksmiths, boarding windows.
4 Police officers attended
1. 2407 EA bearded male in siren car
2. 2489 EA young female in siren car
3. Young MALE in spectacles without a body camera in Van EA 41E
4. Asian young male in Van EA 41E
Michael and I were taken in the van causing my neck aneurism to flare up my Blood pressure to 220/120
Iii.
CAD 3382 201022
I logged with police officer Warrant P233148 Akuji that
a) I need access
b) Michael and I were wrongfully arrested
c) there is no warrant and
d) I want my property back
Akuji stated that I will get a call back from a private number regarding my request and remedy.
Romford County Court is refusing me access to collect my belongings, saying I must contact the bank (Walker Morris LLP fraudsters), even though the bailiffs repeatedly assured us, in front of Police, that we could arrange access any time over the next 10 days, having no intention of complying with their false promises.
SRA SOLICITORS REGULATORY AUTHORITY has refused to investigate Walker Morris LLP, saying that, if it is a criminal matter, it is for the Police.
So please do feel free to do what is necessary to get justice for State and Bank murdered mother, Sadhana Dolly Chaudhari, of State murdered baby Sunaina Chaudhari, and their homeless advocate, myself.
Neelu Berry
I guess she could argue the mental illness clause!1)The following have a priority need for accommodation—
(a)a pregnant woman or a person with whom she resides or might reasonably be expected to reside;
(b)a person with whom dependent children reside or might reasonably be expected to reside;
(c)a person who is vulnerable as a result of old age, mental illness or handicap or physical disability or other special reason, or with whom such a person resides or might reasonably be expected to reside;
(d)a person who is homeless or threatened with homelessness as a result of an emergency such as flood, fire or other disaster.
(e)a person who is homeless as a result of that person being a victim of domestic abuse
Deborah Sampson. She appeared on a 'live' with Anthony Badaloo on Devine's Facebook earlier today. She came across slightly saner than Badaloo and Devine (when they let her get a word in edgeway). I was only half listening, but it sounds like she has suffered a reversal in the Family Courts and has fallen down the rabbit hole of trying to treat it as a matter of contract law.
Now that really would be turn up for the books given the number of times she's protested that she is sane (as only the truly bonkers would I suspect). Hasn't she been on an assessment section a couple of times?AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 10:39 am I guess she could argue the mental illness clause!
But that can always be countered by the sanity clause.
There's no Sanity Claus!
Naw, they'll just reprogram the locks and throw her stuff into the car park. None of that complicated legal tenancy stuff applies and I don't think the loss of business will affect the share price.
To be rebranded as another murder attempt no doubt.ArthurWankspittle wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 9:36 am Naw, they'll just reprogram the locks and throw her stuff into the car park.