Well Belanger’s at it again. He’s back to scourging the spawn of hell, the anti-Christ himself, our Quatloos poster Donald Netolitzky. It turn out that Donald is endlessly writing slanderous, defaming hearsay type of comments full of lies about minister Belanger, a man just selflessly working amongst his flock teaching them the true meaning of Christianity based on Belanger’s personal, idiosyncratic interpretation of the King James Bible. This interpretation requires his followers, as a Christian duty, to become totally worthless parasites demanding endless government largess as constitutionally protected religious entitlements. It’s all right there in the bible!
Paraclete Belanger, until now a model of Christian forbearance and forgiveness, has decided to go on the offensive. But he’s not fighting this battle alone! He’s recruiting his vast army of devoted acolytes to join in the fray against Donald and the Alberta courts! What does he require of them? He wants them to send letters saying how they believe he’s really, really sincere about all the idiotic bullshit he’s slinging. Of course he doesn’t frame it quite that way. He says he needs ‘witnesses’ to write about how they believe he’s sincere in his claimed beliefs. He needs this because the Alberta courts have classified him as OPCA (a side note, they’ve recently classified him as much worse than that, an issue I’ll be discussing in a separate posting later this week). His plea for witnesses is laid out in a recent video titled;
Plea for witnesses to establish the veracity of my ministry
The faith in Christ is under attack and in order to get a court of conscience AKA Chancery I need witnesses to bear their testimony to my ministry as sincere unadulterated and of no quest for financial gain. I will be demanding a court where equity prevails in Chancery and need your help!! owlmon@gmail for your blue ink writing in asseveration verifying my ministry in Christ or
owlmon@protonmail.com or @paracletian on telegram..780-399-6250 is my number
cojsherwoodpark@just.gov.ab.ca is the head Clerks email to send your dated autographed with your name and contact address hand written witness to my ministry, in a form of a scan, to. Please send your graceful witnessing in handwriting to the woman acting as the Clerk at
cojsherwoodpark@just.gov.ab.ca with regards to 240069641P1 and my petition to gain a man in private chambers for court of chancery.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Bgf8b4wImw
He gets to the point immediately;
So this is a deliberate attack on men and women’s ability to freely exercise their faith in Christ. This is an attack. Donald Netolitzky, chief adviser and law scholar for the Alberta courts has been prolific in writing slanderous defaming hearsay type of comments full of lies and aspirations that I’m a bad man and that I deserve nothing less than punishment. So in light of the reasoning behind Donald Netolitzsky’s writings it’s important to note what happened in 2011.
2011? He was doing so well then decided to veer off the rails. Who gives a crap about 2011 regardless of what he thinks happened then?
What follows is a convoluted
Meads v. Meads origin story based on his purported fight with all of Alberta’s courts over a decade ago. It drones on until the exciting climax where he’s just about won and wants to meet with Justice Rooke, (then a lower level judge) but instead Rooke dumped
Meads v Meads on him and that was the ballgame. Apparently the only reason
Meads was written was to stop Belanger, who was just about to demolish the Alberta court system with his unanswerable King James justice, from getting his day in court to do it. After that every time he opened his mouth the courts just beat the crap out of him with OPCA, OPCA, OPCA. From this point everything he argued was “indicia” (he even used air quotes) of OPCA when it was actually really indicia of a man trying to exercise his faith to come out of a Babylonian fraud. This abuse of his religious rights has continued for over a decade. Every court in Alberta just bellows OPCA at him every time he tries to get his Christian rights enforced.
But he’s found a way past this. He’s going to take his case to a court of chancery “ . . . a court of conscience were equity prevails.” It’s his belief that such a court will disregard “the letter of the law”, those statutes giving him so much grief, and rule on the spirit of the law.
Up until this point he’s been calm and, within his limited abilities, logical. But a soon as he started on about equity he started losing it. Shouting, ranting about respecters of persons, dead corporate entities, all of the nonsensical idiocy that forms the basis of his claimed right to religious accommodation. As I’ve discussed numerous times these are the right to be exempt from all man-made laws and the right to demand anything from the government that he wants. He rapidly babbled more nonsense I’m not going to bother with. He said that it’s all Donald’s fault but a Court of Chancery will put Canada back on the true Christian path. Apparently Christians worldwide need him to lead the way. The way he tells it he’s a lock on winning everything he wants in Chancery as long as his followers cough up those letters (handwritten in blue ink) saying how sincere he is in his overwhelming insanity about the real meaning of “person” and how it enslaves us all to a false religion.
He apologized for being so articulate and knowledgeable. I’d say more blowhard myself. I’ve already complained about his endless ramblings and repetitions in a comment about a prior video in this discussion.
Before reviewing another rambling Belanger pile of shit I’m going to make an assumption about how my posting will go. This is based on my lengthy history of viewing past Belanger’s gibberish. He has numerous obsessions, King James Bible, dead whores, respecter of persons, pastoral immunity from laws as a man of Christ just tending his flock. He tends to toss all of these into his videos regardless of the target (in this case Donald) or the purported topic. With twenty years or so of practice he’s fine-tuned this nonsense into a one size fits all rant if something so overwhelmingly tedious can be called a rant. So I anticipate he’ll start by giving a short criticism of whatever he perceives Donald has done to offend him then go into autopilot with his set speech. The practical issue in this, from my perspective, is that there will be nothing new but, given how he’s not even thinking as he does it, there will be a lot to go through. So I’ll probably start reporting points but after a few minutes start skipping portions then abandon it and just go to the end. We’ll see how my patience holds up. So, on to the review.
I was right then and I'm getting the same now. The man can’t help himself, he’s just a dummy, a mouthpiece spewing out “the flow of knowledge comes from this thing up here (clutches his head) connected to the creator and the bank of knowledge in his library." So blame God, things are pre-typed in his brain and God just blasts them out of his mouth faster than he can handle the flow.
Something or other about how he started out by personally getting junk food banned in the schools of Alberta. They all laughed at him but he got it done. Now he was taking his crusade to equity to again defeat the powers that be who have defamed him, slandered him and “cut me down as Donald Netolitzky has been prolific, thousands of documents world-wide, law forums, journals everywhere . . . ” All aimed at one thing, destroying him! Donald wrote
Meads solely to destroy Belanger because his questions to the seven judges in 2011 were just about to shatter the court system. But it wasn’t him, the questions came from The Spirit. Then a few minutes of convoluted conspiracy gibberish. At this point I was 18 minutes into a 21 minute video but I’d had enough and bailed.
I can only see one flaw in his plan to go to a Court of Chancery for relief from the godless Alberta statutory courts. Where is he going to find one? Canada has no courts of equity. Courts of Chancery don’t exist here. Even if there is a court of equity in another country (I’m not going to look it up) they certainly wouldn’t hear an incomprehensible case from a raving Canadian loon. But let’s go to the extreme absurdity of assuming that he found such a court, somehow got a hearing in it, and won a favorable decision. So what? The decision wouldn’t be binding in Canada.
Belanger need to reconnect to a sense of reality regarding Donald. Take
Meads as an example. Belanger obviously believes that the decision was something that Donald personally created and inflicted on him to destroy his Christian ministry. But Donald is just an employee of the Alberta Court of King’s Bench. Regardless of the background authorship of
Meads, whether Donald was responsible for some of it, none of it, or all of it, Donald had no ability to give it the power of law. That was done by Judge Rooke when he signed and released the decision. Belanger’s rantings about how
Meads has shut him up in court since? That was the responsibility of the various judges hearing the individual trials. While they may have referred to
Meads as a precedence these decisions were, in all cases, those of the trial judges. So, as usual, Belanger is just ranting pointless nonsense. Belanger neglected to say what triggered this anti-Donald rant right now. I have some thoughts but I'll wait until my next Belanger posting. As I said it should be this week.
Life seems to be currently very stressful for him. While writing this video up I noticed something in another video that I'd ignored because it didn't seem relevant. It was this one;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ-a0JzPZwk
Belanger seemed to be holding something between two fingers. It turned out to be a cigarette. I've never seen him smoking in a video before but he was incessantly puffing away in this one. Donald induced stress?
Anyhow, enough negativity, let's wish Belanger good luck in finding his court of equity!
