No, not Danny. His counsel was hogging the law library. Can't you tell the difference?webhick wrote:So, Danny was hogging the law library for five hours a day.2. The jail has cut the defendant's counsel's time in the law library to two(2) hours a day about three weeks ago, and some days the counsel gets no time at all.
I can about promise he'll get one...He wants his cookie and his nookie. End of story
The more I read of Dogwalker's rantings the more I think he is flat out incompetent to stand trial. Does he really have the mental wherewithal to understand the process he is involved in. danny tells the courts he will no longer correspond with his court forced lawyer sven wiberg. read his filing here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2176911/danny-274
the courts response in record time...
02/26/2008 ENDORSED ORDER denying 274 Motion to
Dismiss as to Daniel Riley (1). Text of Order: Various
Motions to Dismiss are Denied. The Court understands
that Defendant Daniel Riley represents himself in this
case. The Court declines to remove standby counsel. So
Ordered by Chief Judge George Z. Singal. (jar)
(Entered: 02/26/2008)
however they still list him as pro-se on the docket filings....
Looks like the original indictment had a flaw. Considering that he 'll be going to trial based on Superseding Indictment #3, I think he needs to focus on what 's alleged in that current document instead.The defendant has still never receivedthe picture from the original indictment on page 7, ¶ 10(p). The indictment asserts (not alleges) that defendant RILEY and Co-Conspirator A (Cirino Gonzalez) and another person not named, posed with Ed Brown for a picture. In this picture, the indictment assets "RILEY and co-conspirator A possess rifles."
The photo:p - At a date uncertain but between in or around May 2007 and in or around September 2007, GONZALEZ and GERHARD and another person posed for a photograph with Edward Brown. The photograph was posted to an account on a social networking internet site, myspace.com, that was registered to GERHARD. The internet account was used to make statements in support of Edward Brown and Elaine Brown. In the photograph, GONZALEZ and GERHARD possess rifles ;
I don't see any rifles. Gonzalez and Gerhard have straps on their shoulders, but I don't know if those are rifle straps or camera bags.Demosthenes wrote:The photo:In the photograph, GONZALEZ and GERHARD possess rifles;
You can also see the magazine (from the bottom). It is hard to tell for sure, but it looks like an AR-15.CaptainKickback wrote:In the lower left of the picture, you can see the trigger assembly for a rifle.
Good eye.CaptainKickback wrote:In the lower left of the picture, you can see the trigger assembly for a rifle.
That's precisely what it is.ErsatzAnatchist wrote: You can also see the magazine (from the bottom). It is hard to tell for sure, but it looks like an AR-15.
I think you're channeling Stevie. Danny wasn't all talk with no action. He purchased the explosive material himself, had it delivered to his home, and then drove it to the Browns to build those pesky bombs.Danny, who are basically all talk and no action,
Whereis Steve these days? Haven't seen him lately.I think you're channeling Stevie.
Hey - knock it off. I don't want to draw him back in. It's nice to lurk (as I generally do) knowing that the offtopic rate is at a reasonable level. Steve's ability to threadjack was pretty good. If he had half an ounce of sense, he could be a public information officer somewhere and do quite well.Dr. Caligari wrote:Whereis Steve these days? Haven't seen him lately.I think you're channeling Stevie.
Just what Stevie said!UGA Lawdog wrote:One, I don't really care what you think, since you insult me by comparing me with that idiot.Demosthenes wrote: I think you're channeling Stevie.
Two, yes, these idiots made bombs and threats. But when push came to shove, their pledges not to be taken without a fight came to naught. They punked out.
Yea, I tend to agree. As an interesting parallel, there was a report released recently that gave the background of an Aryan Nation's member, Sean Michael Gillespie. In 2004, he threw a Molotov cocktail at the Temple B'Nai Israel in Oklahoma City, OK. It did some minor (smoke) damage and no one was injured. He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to 30 years, and has been housed in maximum/high security facilities ever since. Although the motivations behind the crimes were different, I'd say the only difference between the two is the forward motion of an arm, or alternatively, a 4 pound trigger pull. Dogwalker and crew made their intent clear through multiple statements, and gathered/created the explosives and weapons necessary to act on those threats. Where Gillespie had a flammable liquid in a container, Dogwalker and crew had what the ATF categorized as a few hundred (if I recall correctly) explosive items/devices. If cases like Gillespie's are any guide, Dogwalker is looking at a very, very long time in jail. It will be nice when this is finally over, though. Perhaps then Dogwalker and crew will fade permanently into obscurity and be forgotten by all.Unfortunately, it is far, far more likely that Danny will be spending a very, very long and bitter time in prison.
Perhaps I can be of assistance.UGA Lawdog wrote:You just don't know when to quit, do you? Steve didn't advocate cutting anyone's nuts off in exchange for letting them out of the joint.Demosthenes wrote:Just what Stevie said!
http://quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.p ... a&start=45
Has anyone actually even seen UGA Lawdog and Stevie at the same time?