Good Advice from a CtC regular

A collection of old posts from all forums. No new threads or new posts in old threads allowed. For archive use only.
jkeeb
Pirate Judge of Which Things Work
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:13 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Good Advice from a CtC regular

Post by jkeeb »

PLease chime in with OFF RECORD suggestions for entertainment purposes of only of course!

Convinced friend to do CtC filings for all years.

She received IRS Summons for books and records and unfiled returns for May 1st (Tuesday)

Wrote 4 page letter citing Shulz v US, etc, etc. (not enough info here, I know) and she has little records she can show them...

She does not plan to go to summons.

Filed regular 1040s 00, 01 and 02

Years in question are 00 to 06

Will file all years (1040x +1040s) ala CtC next month [ASAP].

Her question, is it relatively safe to ignore IRS summons if she does CtC filings for all years ASAP.

She is considering going to court to quash IRS summons.

She is familiar w/ PHs Summons Paper..
I guess this is how they start. Six years, six frivolous returns.[/b]
Remember that CtC is about the rule of law.

John J. Bulten
Top
jkeeb
Pirate Judge of Which Things Work
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:13 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by jkeeb »

In the above case, the "friend" gets $3000 in frivolous filing penalties. What liability does "juju" have in the matter?
Remember that CtC is about the rule of law.

John J. Bulten
Top
Brian Rookard
Beefcake
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 5:09 am

Post by Brian Rookard »

jkeeb wrote:In the above case, the "friend" gets $3000 in frivolous filing penalties. What liability does "juju" have in the matter?
That depends on whether the law uses the words "liable for" ... doncha know
Top
hartley

Post by hartley »

I just find it amusing that jkeeb has now hit exactly 1099 posts...
Top
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7559
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Post by The Observer »

hartley wrote:I just find it amusing that jkeeb has now hit exactly 1099 posts...
Sigh - we keep warning jkeeb about leaving telltale signs of the Conspiracy lying about...
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Top
Kimokeo

Post by Kimokeo »

jkeeb, you are wrong. It's not $3,000.

It'll be $30,000. The penalty is now $5,000 per friv - not $500.

With that $30k will be a lien and most likely levies.
Top
jkeeb
Pirate Judge of Which Things Work
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:13 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by jkeeb »

And CtC keeps on working......
Gosh that sounds like the scenario for me for 2000 and 2001. After adverse decision from CDPH, I received final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Intent to Lien. I now receive 15% of my net income every two weeks and have a lien on my house.This is a great life!!
Remember that CtC is about the rule of law.

John J. Bulten
Top
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7559
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Post by The Observer »

jkeeb wrote:And CtC keeps on working......
Gosh that sounds like the scenario for me for 2000 and 2001. After adverse decision from CDPH, I received final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Intent to Lien. I now receive 15% of my net income every two weeks and have a lien on my house.This is a great life!!
Well, if David would ever come clean about his termination of liens, he could show that CtCer how to get that wage levy released.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Top

Return to “Public Archives -- Read Only”