Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
-
- Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
- Posts: 5773
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm
Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Patrick Mooney Tax Court Case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/mooney1.pdf
Result: Patrick lost and was sanctioned $1,000
Patrick Mooney Appellate Court:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/mooney2.pdf
Result: The Appeals Court affirmed Tax Court's decision
Donald Gray District Court Permanent Injunction:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/gray1.pdf
Result: Gray was permanently enjoined from filing Hendrickson-type refunds/returns
Beverly J. Hill District Court Permanent Injunction:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/hill203.pdf
Result: Hill was permanently enjoined from filing Hendrickson-type refunds/returns
Beverly J. Hill Appellate Court:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/hill208.pdf
Result: Permanent injunction affirmed
Eugene Warner:
Andrew Scott:
Roger Menner:
Joseph Alan Fennell:
Sharon K. Artman DIstrict Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/artman5.pdf
Result: repaid $8,597.39 in 2006, and accused the government of being at fault because they trusted her CtC amended returns
Michael J. Dowling District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/dowling14.pdf
Result: repaid back his $26,520 refund plus interest plus a $500 frivolous filing penalty in 2006
Joy M. Ferguson District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/ferguson50.pdf
Result: repaid $4,753 plus interest in 2008 via garnishment
Melvin L. Gerstenkorn District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/gerston16.pdf
Result: never responded to the DOJ's motion for summary judgment and was ordered to repay $2,275 plus interest
Larry B. Golson and Debra G. Golson District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/golson18.pdf
Result: repaid $69,761 plus interest in 2006
James A. Spitzer District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/spitzer49.pdf
Result: ordered to repay $16,614 plus interest plus $16,285 in sanctions
James Spitzer Appeal:
It's a work in progress. I'll flesh out the remaining links in a few minutes.
In the meantime, who have I forgotten?
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/mooney1.pdf
Result: Patrick lost and was sanctioned $1,000
Patrick Mooney Appellate Court:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/mooney2.pdf
Result: The Appeals Court affirmed Tax Court's decision
Donald Gray District Court Permanent Injunction:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/gray1.pdf
Result: Gray was permanently enjoined from filing Hendrickson-type refunds/returns
Beverly J. Hill District Court Permanent Injunction:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/hill203.pdf
Result: Hill was permanently enjoined from filing Hendrickson-type refunds/returns
Beverly J. Hill Appellate Court:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/hill208.pdf
Result: Permanent injunction affirmed
Eugene Warner:
Andrew Scott:
Roger Menner:
Joseph Alan Fennell:
Sharon K. Artman DIstrict Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/artman5.pdf
Result: repaid $8,597.39 in 2006, and accused the government of being at fault because they trusted her CtC amended returns
Michael J. Dowling District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/dowling14.pdf
Result: repaid back his $26,520 refund plus interest plus a $500 frivolous filing penalty in 2006
Joy M. Ferguson District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/ferguson50.pdf
Result: repaid $4,753 plus interest in 2008 via garnishment
Melvin L. Gerstenkorn District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/gerston16.pdf
Result: never responded to the DOJ's motion for summary judgment and was ordered to repay $2,275 plus interest
Larry B. Golson and Debra G. Golson District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/golson18.pdf
Result: repaid $69,761 plus interest in 2006
James A. Spitzer District Court case:
http://www.cheatingfrenzy.com/spitzer49.pdf
Result: ordered to repay $16,614 plus interest plus $16,285 in sanctions
James Spitzer Appeal:
It's a work in progress. I'll flesh out the remaining links in a few minutes.
In the meantime, who have I forgotten?
Demo.
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Just remember that on Warner and Menner, there are questions.
Menner claims to have used CtC, but Hendrickson claims that Menner did not, or that Menner didn't do it "right." Who knows.......
Warner claims to have used CtC, since Warner sent his refund check to Hendrickson. Hendrickson posted the refund check on the losthorizons web site as a CtC "victory," so Hendrickson is obviously deemed to be claiming that Warner used CtC. But as I recall, it hasn't been established for sure that Warner actually used CtC.
Menner claims to have used CtC, but Hendrickson claims that Menner did not, or that Menner didn't do it "right." Who knows.......
Warner claims to have used CtC, since Warner sent his refund check to Hendrickson. Hendrickson posted the refund check on the losthorizons web site as a CtC "victory," so Hendrickson is obviously deemed to be claiming that Warner used CtC. But as I recall, it hasn't been established for sure that Warner actually used CtC.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
- Posts: 5773
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Gurus *always* disavow followers who are indicted / convicted. Schiff consistently marketed that "no one has ever gone to jail for using my methods" even after several Schiff clients were rotting in their cells.
Demo.
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
It is telling that everyone you listed is still listed on Pete's site under "Victories".
http://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories.htm
It's almost like someone from the government went through the list refund checks posted on Pete's site and just started going after people.. Really, who could have seen that coming?
http://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories.htm
It's almost like someone from the government went through the list refund checks posted on Pete's site and just started going after people.. Really, who could have seen that coming?
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Do you actually think the government would go to all the trouble to read all those victory postings; research via check numbers, document locator numbers, amounts paid, and dates to determine the names of the CtC educated victors; and create multiple archival copies of the web sites (in case the originals vanish) just to persecute a handful of freedom-loving individuals who learned the deepest secrets of the tax code?
Damn straight they did.
And thanks again, Pete. It would have been so much harder without all your self-aggrandizing posts.
Damn straight they did.
And thanks again, Pete. It would have been so much harder without all your self-aggrandizing posts.
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Dang thats cold Nikki. remind me not to tick you offNikki wrote:Do you actually think the government would go to all the trouble to read all those victory postings; research via check numbers, document locator numbers, amounts paid, and dates to determine the names of the CtC educated victors; and create multiple archival copies of the web sites (in case the originals vanish) just to persecute a handful of freedom-loving individuals who learned the deepest secrets of the tax code?
Damn straight they did.
And thanks again, Pete. It would have been so much harder without all your self-aggrandizing posts.
-
- Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
- Posts: 5773
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Here are the names (in order) from Page 1 of Pete's victory pages.
George Baer's numbers are big enough for the IRS/DOJ to go the criminal prosecution route. According to public record, the IRS filed a $108,008 lien against George on 5/27/2008. CtC victory!George A. Baer 12/24/2004 $28,202.13 lien
George A. Baer 7/22/2005 $22,212.99 lien
George A. Baer 9/8/2006 $39,008.88 lien
Joy M. Ferguson 3/18/2005 $2,214.69 district court
Joy M. Ferguson 3/25/2005 $2,538.86 district court
Patrick M. Mooney 2/25/2005 $513.24 tax court
Patrick M. Mooney 7/22/2004 $502.00 tax court
Patrick M. Mooney 2/23/2007 $1,319.14 tax court
Joseph A. Fennell 2/4/2005 $5,235.72 tax court
Larry B. and Debra G. Olson 9/24/2004 $69,760.85 district court
Burlan O. and Virginia A. Akins 11/12/2004 $2,880.00
Michelle M. Fay 8/17/2004 $2,690.00
Valdavid Smithson 10/15/2004 $6,945.17
Yvonne P. Wesley 10/29/2004 $1,754.53
Yvonne P. Wesley 5/6/2005 $445.96
Phillip S. Bates 11/5/2004 $2,267.74
Phillip S. Bates 11/5/2004 $1,611.20
Amanda R. Bates 11/5/2004 $467.29
Demo.
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
I still don't feel comfortable giving out names yet, but you can add three more that lost on the state level....
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
It was also very nice of Pete to post all his victories in chronological order so there's less of a chance of blowing a statute by working from the top down.
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Which is okay to do for money, so long as you're in Nevada.Nikki wrote:It was also very nice of Pete to post all his victories in chronological order so there's less of a chance of blowing a statute by working from the top down.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
yup we definatley have to partywebhick wrote:Which is okay to do for money, so long as you're in Nevada.Nikki wrote:It was also very nice of Pete to post all his victories in chronological order so there's less of a chance of blowing a statute by working from the top down.
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Glad to see that you've come to your senses, Mutter. Since changing my untenable relationship to government, the red carpet has been rolled out. I have been wined and dined-- escargot and cavier, filet mignon and the most expensive wines have been liberally proferred almost nightly as well as gorgeous women, lavish getaways, and introductions to the most exclusive circles of the rich and powerful! I wish you the best of luck, yourself!
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
ain't it great to be an illuminati shill?Number Six wrote:Glad to see that you've come to your senses, Mutter. Since changing my untenable relationship to government, the red carpet has been rolled out. I have been wined and dined-- escargot and cavier, filet mignon and the most expensive wines have been liberally proferred almost nightly as well as gorgeous women, lavish getaways, and introductions to the most exclusive circles of the rich and powerful! I wish you the best of luck, yourself!
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
If you were really an Illuminati shill, you'd be too traumatized to be bragging about it.Gregg wrote:ain't it great to be an illuminati shill?Number Six wrote:Glad to see that you've come to your senses, Mutter. Since changing my untenable relationship to government, the red carpet has been rolled out. I have been wined and dined-- escargot and cavier, filet mignon and the most expensive wines have been liberally proferred almost nightly as well as gorgeous women, lavish getaways, and introductions to the most exclusive circles of the rich and powerful! I wish you the best of luck, yourself!
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Gregg, I am not a shill for the illuminati. I am a little traumatized, which accounts for my quirky sense of humor.
I believe we are all have a common ground in the future of America, even those who deny a stake in its future, that if anarchy prevails, no one will be safe--virtually every plebiscitary revolution has resulted in unpredictable results. The balance between government and individual rights is a hard one. If you are a free market, lew rockwell, anti-government sort, you might want to check out gary north's site for practical advice.
All of the political arguments that are being made now, were debated in previous decades far more rigorously. There is a reason the current legal system developed slowly and methodically, and why the highest court has rejected frivolous arguments and legal theories. Not because there is a conspiracy of any sort, but because they are generally making necessary compromises. Personally, I would like to see most of the smut peddlers prosecuted vigorously and internet porn censored in the US as India has done, I hope we will all see that day.
I believe we are all have a common ground in the future of America, even those who deny a stake in its future, that if anarchy prevails, no one will be safe--virtually every plebiscitary revolution has resulted in unpredictable results. The balance between government and individual rights is a hard one. If you are a free market, lew rockwell, anti-government sort, you might want to check out gary north's site for practical advice.
All of the political arguments that are being made now, were debated in previous decades far more rigorously. There is a reason the current legal system developed slowly and methodically, and why the highest court has rejected frivolous arguments and legal theories. Not because there is a conspiracy of any sort, but because they are generally making necessary compromises. Personally, I would like to see most of the smut peddlers prosecuted vigorously and internet porn censored in the US as India has done, I hope we will all see that day.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Unless you have been made an honorary lifetime member, in which case your memory of the induction ceremonies is erased and you receive 75 interns. May Chtululu be praised!!!webhick wrote:If you were really an Illuminati shill, you'd be too traumatized to be bragging about it.Gregg wrote:ain't it great to be an illuminati shill?Number Six wrote:Glad to see that you've come to your senses, Mutter. Since changing my untenable relationship to government, the red carpet has been rolled out. I have been wined and dined-- escargot and cavier, filet mignon and the most expensive wines have been liberally proferred almost nightly as well as gorgeous women, lavish getaways, and introductions to the most exclusive circles of the rich and powerful! I wish you the best of luck, yourself!
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
That's all me, I'm in it for the interns!Unless you have been made an honorary lifetime member, in which case your memory of the induction ceremonies is erased and you receive 75 interns. May Chtululu be praised!!!
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
Interns? No one said I could get interns. Sign me up!
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Cases involving Pete Hendrickson's scam
I notice that my title has changed from "Admiral" (me like that one, visions of Horatio Nelson, John Paul Jones and Bill Halsey in my mind) to "Conde sumptin other" which sounds like some wimpy french bedpan washer....
How do y'all get snazzy NWO titles,,,,and can someone pick and assign me a suitable avatar, I have tried and I guess it's just beyond my skills...
How do y'all get snazzy NWO titles,,,,and can someone pick and assign me a suitable avatar, I have tried and I guess it's just beyond my skills...
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.