












Oh the shame, the humiliation....must have hit a nerve with the Observer
Do you call yourself that because you like to watch?
If you mean that do I like to watch people go to ridiculous lengths in creating lies to cover up their criminal behavior - yes.gottago wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh the shame, the humiliation....must have hit a nerve with the Observer
Do you call yourself that because you like to watch?
. wrote:So, is your attorney aware of the fact that you could dispense with 90% or 95% of the gains which resulted in the taxes due if you could reconstruct the records?
Successful, while the exact details may differ slightly, is a pretty well known term among Americans.student wrote: These statistics are nearly impossible to obtain, outside of relying upon occasional anecdotal clues. Your definition of "unsuccessful" is totally different than a Mexican strawberry picker's, or a family who's on the brink of bankruptsy.
Assume you work and owe income taxes, anyone who fails to pay their income tax is either stupid or naive. When the law catches up to them, they will most likely find themselves in the "unsuccessful" category.I don't pay income taxes because I refuse to give money to strangers. Does this mean I'm unsuccessful?
I'm happy with who I am. I am successful and have no fear of being hauled away by the IRS.You sound like an adult female. Who do you wanna be like?
This would be the same "lawful money" that you're unable to make any purchases with, and the reason why your daughter is not getting financial support from her father. You're a loser and a dead beat.David Merrill wrote: See? There she goes again. All I have is lawful money - redeemed private credit.
Could you sum up GottaGo's situation? I think I must have missed that thread.Nikki wrote:Funny that the villiage idiot has to pipe up, again, on a topic about which he knows nothing.
He, since the threads never mentioned him by name or alias, has totally ignoreg gottago's history here and her issue with stock transaction records.
But, why should he start now letting ignorance interfere with his opinions.
silversopp wrote:This would be the same "lawful money" that you're unable to make any purchases with, and the reason why your daughter is not getting financial support from her father. You're a loser and a dead beat.David Merrill wrote: See? There she goes again. All I have is lawful money - redeemed private credit.
Funny that the villiage idiot has to pipe up, again, on a topic about which he knows nothing.
He, since the threads never mentioned him by name or alias, has totally ignoreg gottago's history here and her issue with stock transaction records.
But, why should he start now letting ignorance interfere with his opinions.
Or possibly she cannot wrap her mind around the fact that Federal Reserve Notes are stock certificates for private bankers trading among themselves...They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...
I mean really! This guy was obviously a banker trading stock certificates. He had neglected to get out of private banking in the Fed by redeeming his notes in lawful money - just like you Quatlosers. Except for the error is that the courts will never support your position that David Merrill cannot operate in redeemed lawful money......although entitled to redeem his note...
Even though I've probably seen him regurgitate this same nonsense at least 50 times, I still laugh every time I see it.Van Pelt wrote:the fact that Federal Reserve Notes are stock certificates for private bankers trading among themselves
GottaGo is the latest incarnation (she changed her handle at least three times) of a woman who has some serious problems with the IRS.silversopp wrote:Could you sum up GottaGo's situation? I think I must have missed that thread.
It seems it's just the TPs here that interpret the law on the internet. The rest of us just refer to what the law really is by citing court cases.David Merrill wrote: Sure! We are all entitled to our opinions. We can all interprete the law and history in Internet forums - which is exactly what we do. I think what Silversopp fails to consider is that she has no information or indication that people have no right to redeem lawful money except some very flimsy indications:
It is hard to wrap anything around a fabrication.Or possibly she cannot wrap her mind around the fact that Federal Reserve Notes are stock certificates for private bankers trading among themselves...
There's a lot more to her story than just that, but it is all on a thread which is buried in the old forum.
Why? Because my questions are touching a nerve?gottago wrote:I have no intention of responding to your inane questions.
If there is any "touchiness" it is because you are proceeding from a position of hypocrisy. This site was set up based on a simple and forthright priniciple: for discussion and exposition of frauds and schemes. It was not based on lies or dishonesty, but the legality of the government to assess and collect taxes. Thus, the message that Quatloosers have been stating from Day One has been based on the law and court rulings. No one has ever come to this site and been told a lie about how the courts will rule against them.I just commented that since the quats seem to have the "tax protestors" all figured out that maybe it was time to comment on the psychological profile of you and the other members of the quats, which is clearly a touchy subject. I already have a mental picture of most of you and what you are, what you value and what you believe in. Quite simple actually.
I wouldn't label your posts interacting anymore than I would call a child sticking her tongue out at her mother being interactive. Its just childish behavior.It is a shame that it bothers you so much for someone to intrude into your little world here. I just find it amusing to interact with you.
Which is why I treat everything you say about lien "terminations" as hearsay. Once you can actually show something where a court has upheld your theory, then we can start believing you.David Merrill wrote:Good thing even on the Internet; Hearsay is like it was never heard.
You, on the other hand, have told several lies and half-truths about your situation.
It's interesting that you fault people for responding to your possible suicide attempt after you posted it in a public forum. If you didn't want the attention, why would you post it?I have never told any lies about my situation. After my original post, jj took it upon herself to scour the internet and find some posts on a cruise website, attribute them to me while providing details about my personal information on here and stating she had my personal information, including my location and address while stating her "concern" for my safety and saying she would contact my family and the police since I was suicidal. The original post, if you were to reread it, was written somewhat tongue-in-cheek and I have subsequently stated that I was not then or ever truly suicidal. But who cares, it is better to support your resident busybody and enable her to meet her pathetic needs for self esteem. She is the lowest form of human garbage I have ever encountered but you all support and encourage her. She has found her place in the world.
I have provided a true life account of how following Irwin Schiff bullshit has led me to my current situation. The irs has taken my job, money and property. I have submitted an offer in compromise that has been pending for almost 9 months. The amount that the irs says I owe is inaccurate but the actual amount really does not matter. I can't pay them. I will never be able to pay them.
But proceed with your insults and analysis of me and my character. Considering the source, it is truly meaningless. Keep seeking the self esteem and superiority that you crave.
Everyone needs to meet their needs in life--if you can not succeed in reality then insulting strangers with your identity safely hidden the next best thing. Keep observing!
I've known people that had problems with the IRS. They never have had their job "taken by the IRS". How did that happen exactly? The people I have known worked with the IRS on a payment plan, and after some years, paid their debt and never worried about it since. Why do you think you can never pay them back?gottago wrote: I have provided a true life account of how following Irwin Schiff bullshit has led me to my current situation. The irs has taken my job, money and property. I have submitted an offer in compromise that has been pending for almost 9 months. The amount that the irs says I owe is inaccurate but the actual amount really does not matter. I can't pay them. I will never be able to pay them.