In a thread entitled "Continental Army banned" (posted by user "Thorn"):
User "Thorn then adds his/her own comments:Fellow CtC Warriors,
I have been banned. This is Pete Hendrickson's site and I respect his right to ban my speech as participation on this forum is a privilege. It has not been my intention to be destructive, but constructive in all I have written.
I salute Pete and each one of you for the courage you have illustrated in this journey.
I will continue to promote the truths I have learned on this site as well as my belief that as an American Citizen domiciled in a Union state, that I am a "nonresident alien." The truth will be revealed as we all work together to find it. Keep up the good work. I'm sorry to have been banned, but I will not compromise my beliefs. Pete will not compromise his either. So it goes. The truth doesn't care what either one of us believes. It is what it is.
Gentlemen, we must hang together or certainly we will all hang separately.
God Speed,
continentalarmy
http://www.losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=2431Fellow CtC patriots,
I was just informed that Continental Army has been banned from the forum. This isn't a victory for anyone except the Govgoons. Pete, you have done an amazing job of "Cracking the Code" on how the powers that be, our elected officials, dupe us into legally, yet unknowingly, volunteering our hard earned property every year. Continental Army has spent months determining just how this duping truly begins, and quite possibly, the only real way to be free men again.
Continental Army has personally spread the truth of your website to literally hundreds of fellow Americans. He and I, along with others, attended the San Antonio Alamo Tea Party, hoisting the biggest Losthorizons.com sign anyone has made. WE GOT YOUR SITE ON MILLIONS OF TELEVISIONS!!! I hope you will reconsider your decision. Although our discussions are heated at times, they have bolstered a remarkable amount of education among all of us. An enemy of my enemy, is my friend. ........
Thorn
User "PeacefulKancer" (Kyle Huwer) posts:
Then, he posts gibberish about Frank Brushaber (not reproduced here).Let this be a lesson...
On this board we do not talk about Citizenship and/or SSNs because certain people do not believe it is the right path.
CA ["continentalarmy"] is not the first person to be banned for this. In fact, look at the Top 10 posters... half of them were banned for talking about Citizenship/SSNs.
Point? Maybe those "big posters" of us are all crazy. Or, maybe all of us "big posters" after thousands of hours of research are coming to a different conclusion - that citizenship and SSNs DO matter.
With this said, I expect to be banned soon as well because I am on board the whole idea of citizenship and SSNs. So here is my dying salvo...
Kyle continues:
User "holbrook" chimes in:I don't know about you all, but I've put plenty of time into this and currently not a single agency will respond to me anymore. Why? I've seen people go into court and not even say the "wage" word and then the court dictates in their ruling that the person made "wages." Hasn't this very type of action by the courts been seen by other posters of this board? Maybe, because we are just that "citizen" that makes "income" instead of "income deriving from privilege"? Maybe this is why when people when in criminal court, they lose in civil court - because they won on default instead of the truth? Maybe it is a kangaroo court because only certain people are supposed to be in there in the first place... so when we come in there saying we shouldn't even be there, we get laughed off!
In any case, I wish this forum would be more open than it is. People getting banned for all this talk... the board getting washed multiple times... etc. But hey, I am not the owner and the owner has the right to do what they see fit!
Good luck to everyone taking this humbling journey and I will be talking to you offline CA
Peter E. "Blowhard" Hendrickson ("ForumAdmin") responds:All I can say is that this is very, very discouraging! I truly hope that Pete re-considers this and brings Continental back into the fold.
We need him and everyone who contributes so much on this site.
To continue to ban people who ARE contributing, is self-destruction....just what auntie ["auntie" is tax protester slang for "Internal Revenue Service"] wants!
Patrick Mooney snuggles up to Blowhard Hendrickson (wow, what a surprise!):Actually, ContintentalArmy is (or was) not banned. I simply disabled his membership in what I imagined would be no more than a 24-hour hiatus while he responded to my inquiry about some evidence of either his victories or his battles. His persistent posting of what is nothing but counter-productive distractions had led me to suspect his bona fides as someone actually in this fight, as opposed to someone here to dispel the energy of those who are in the fight.
I got a reply earlier today which has not reassured me. Those who know CA may have more to say about this, but he tells me (still refusing to provide evidence) that he and many he knows have won their CtC-educated victories, but he (and they) refuse to share them out of "prudence".
Frankly, I find this about as disturbing as outright ill purpose. Everybody in this fight on behalf of the rule of law has an interest in every victory and in every ongoing battle, and keeping either from the rest of us is inappropriate, to say the least. I also have difficulty giving it much credence. Everyone in this community knows that although I don't favor them, I will go so far as to redact all personal info, including names, from documents and checks before posting. Thus, the "just trying to be prudent" thing is a thin excuse for failing to share, much less failing to provide evidence of one's actual position on this field even with a request that it not be posted at all.
The bottom line is that furnishing me with evidence of bona fides will suffice for restoration of posting privileges.
[ . . . ]
CtC ALREADY produces "Sorry for the inconvenience" notices, and for the first time in history in direct response to educated filings EXPLICITLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY EXPLAINING THEMSELVES, and after elaborate efforts to thwart them. You have all seen dozens of those, and hundreds and hundreds of varyingly simple and complex returns of withheld property, all of them historical firsts going on continuously for many years now. Do you people not remember these things? I know that many of you don't even bother reading my weekly newsletters, since I virtually never see anything posted in them show up as a topic of discussion here-- maybe this is how you forget. Try to remember.
In short, the legal battle is over. It has been for seven years. What is left is the PR battle, and this haring after silver bullets is keeping you and others from that fray-- which is to say, it is keeping you from doing what really needs to be done.
By the way, those who really want to cling to the distractions might want to ask themselves where is the evidence of the successful deployment of any of this citizenship/residency theorizing? Are you all aware that you are not the first to be spun down that path? There have been folks furiously scratching at that itch for many years, with nothing to show for it. After all, where are all the wins SEDM [Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, one of the scam sites by Christopher Hansen] has to display after some ten years of beating the "non-resident alien" path? Where are the victories of all the "Red Amendment" folks posted?
Wake up, people.
Finally, PeacefulKancer, you are, unfortunately, offering a perfect example of what I discuss a bit above. You (along with all others) have been directed many times to the posts on the subjects you bring up [ . . . ] It appears that you never troubled yourself to read through any of these. Please do. While you may not end up persuaded that you are wrong, you will at least be obliged to measure your views against facts that I think you will find to be an uncomfortable fit, and to measure your words accordingly.
I have banned an achingly tiny number of participants in this forum over the six years of its existence, and do not look forward to adding to that number. But I won't have it be a tool for sowing confusion, distraction and error into the minds of good folks who come here with a righteous intent to stand up and get into the fray, or who look for uplift and productive information and feedback.
Umm. They beat you in court Mr. Mooney. And they're about to do it again. Are you losing your cases because the IRS "knows the public is ignorant"? That's your answer?I fully support Pete's decision in this matter, and for much the same reason. Having looked into the eye of the IRS in a courtroom myself (and getting ready to do it again), I can tell you that their "game" is weak, as far as the law is concerned.
Their entire strategy is to ignore you while bullying you into submission. The only reason they are successful is because they know how ignorant the public is.
Later, the MoonMeister continues:
You just can't make up stuff like this.I personally detest those who come to this forum and try to steer good people away from the very great achievments [sic] Pete has won on our behalf. We owe this man our loyalty and enduring thanks for as long as America remains free, and beyond that should despotic times befall the people of this land.
HOOORAY, PETE! I SECOND THE EXPULSION!