Yes, the bankers/DOJ/IRS finally got their wish today sentencing our great American hero Pete Hendrickson.
Famspire, send me your address and I'll send you the promised silver coin. But what's to be made of it, what's to explain it? This was a very important case for the bankers; much was at stake. And what we have is further proof of the banker's boast:
Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws. ~Mayer Amschel Rothschild
When it comes to the rule of law in a banker-controlled country, all bets are off. Face it, if you've got a trillion dollar river flowing into your coffers, you'll happily spend a little of it to keep up the lie & keep it coming. The bankers pulled out all the stops to ensure a victory here, including:
1) buy off a federal judge (what do they go for these days?)
2) dismiss any juror (mere "lay people") who wants to see the relevant statute
3) make sure the jurors are as deceived as the rest of the sheeple; that the key custom terms are not revealed.
4) ensure that the Judge, required by law to instruct on the true meaning of the law, followed the DOJ instructions. To wit
"As it relates to the charges in this case, I instruct you that the term "employee" means any individual who performs services and who has a legal employer-employee relationship with the person for whom he performs these services." An obfuscatory definition at best, circular in that it uses the term itself inside the definition, and, serving to
hide the real meaning & statutory definition of "employee."
5) enticing the defendant to hire a CIA asset as lead attorney
Note also, the plaintiff never proved Hendrickson had a taxable liability, and govt claimed they didn't have to.
http://www.losthorizons.com/LastShotFor ... efiers.htm