http://www.losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewt ... ed7e6983c2
and later asks him:You keep making reference to common law remedies and suggesting that by pursuing such remedies we can finally get some justice, but how do we do it?
Are there some common law courts where the judges actually respect the law? Or do we have to use the same courts presided over by the same crooked judges? Are we to believe that rosen respects the common law? OR that the appeals court will suddenly act lawfully if only someone would make refernce to common law?
Pete asked you, thru his wife Doreen, to write up an actual brief cusotmized to his case. What better way to put your common law remedies to the test? Is there a more important case than Pete's? Why don't you write something up he can use. He may not know much about common law remedy, but he sounds willing to try it.
Can you at least cite some 21st century cases where a party successfully invoked the common law to either defend his liberty, property or what have you, or to prosecute those that committed common law torts against him?
I don't want to discourage you from posting. All this common law stuff sounds great, but this 2010 in the U.S.S.A. and the federal judiciary is beyond corrupt. Are they really going to say "Oh, your common law rights have been violated. Why didn't you say so in the first place. Let us fix this right away."?
Skankbeat of course rises to the challenge by telling Hangem High that it's not his job to do research for other people or write briefs for them. So basically Skank just throws out ideas without any support for their validity. Of course he explains that away. Apparently he's very busy dealing with the US Treasury Secretary and just doesn't have time to taken on any more responsibilitiesSkankBeat, umm did I say you were a "lesser person"? I simply asked why don't you write a brief? Do you see no benefit from helping the author of Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America to get released from the gulag? And to do it while invoking the common law to boot? Thus showing to all doubters that the common law is not dead but a very powerful tool for protecting our freedoms? Seems like a worthwhile effort if common law is still alive and recognized by the courts.
You certainly have the right to decline to write a brief for him or anyone else, but if the common law is as powerful as you say I simply do not understand why you do not demonstrate as much.
You have also apparently declined to offer any 21st century court cases where the common law was successfully invoked. Do you know of any? And if it's the same crooked judges presiding over a court where common law is invoked, will the powerful and shadowy interests who are blackmailing/bribing them just go away and let them deliver justice? You seem to have declined to comment on this point as well.