PeanutGallery wrote:Almost, I think the horse needs to have a horn though.
The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:12 am
- Location: England, UK
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
-
- Pirate Captain
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:36 pm
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
PeanutGallery wrote:Almost, I think the horse needs to have a horn though.longdog wrote: I think this is the appropriate smilie... :beatinghorse:
-
- Pirate Captain
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:36 pm
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
I should have checked for updates before posting mine. I think unicorns need to be white though :-)
-
- Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:12 am
- Location: England, UK
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Agreed, but I prefer my horn. If my artistic talent could be combined with yours, we'd give Picasso a run for his monet.Forsyth wrote:I think unicorns need to be white though :-)
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
I have to confess, had some nice person torn up/burnt any papers held by a bank concerning debts owed by me ( back in the day when I had such things) I may not have given them a place to hide......but I would not have rushed to turn them in either. I have visited the Cookson Hills and like the 1930s it is still a farm based economy. Floyd was of that stock , Farmers were hit hardest in the great depression both financially and by the weather..... If any of you read this please do not bother making comparisons to Hitler or those fools that hold our attention today.PeanutGallery wrote:It may be that he burned the mortgages, but his reason for doing so may have not been as clear cut as people might first think. It would certainly be beneficial for a criminal to have any number of 'honest citizens' in his debt and prepared to look the other way should questions be asked in regard to his whereabouts.Yiamcross wrote:I can't find any reference...vampireLOREN wrote: As much as it pains me, she is pretty close to the truth here. Charles Arthur Floyd was no gangster, as much as the FBI would like to paint him as such and yes he took the mortgages and he burnt them. He had the touch of a Robin Hood about him. 150,000...maybe more attended his funeral, his brother was voted Sheriff in their home town for 30 years.
The main difference was he helped farmers who wanted to pay and couldn't . Charles was a thief and a rogue......but a good lad too!.
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- First Mate
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:11 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
So the silly old fool realises that they were de-valuing their house further, but kept on at it
Tom Crawford
12 hrs
With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNX5d98rwLs
Tom Crawford
12 hrs
With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNX5d98rwLs
-
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Hello kids, i'm Inspector Berryman. I'm here with MaGruff the Crime Dog to talk to you about delusional scam artists.NG3 wrote:He's part of the community team, he deals with things like liaising with neighbourhood watch schemes, sending officers in to schools, and humouring strange old men who phone in with silly complaints.Skeleton wrote: That will be Inspector Berryman who seems to be Tom's go to Policeman.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Your house wasn't stolen Tom, that's the f*cking difference.what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner (and my house)
If you wanna make the car analogy work, you Tom, stopped paying your car loan and got the car repossessed.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
TC seems to be resigned to his defeat now. Nothing left in him but hot air and sour grapes.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1026
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:37 am
- Location: Thailand
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Tom as usual being economic with the truth, the auctioneers were not "informed." Rent-a-mob attended said auction and waited until the Farm came up, then went into rent-a-mob mode and the auction was stopped. The farm was later sold for what many have said was less than it would have realised at auction, rent-a -mobs actions being cited as having scared away potential bidders.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played.
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
letissier14 wrote:There has been some posts (mainly pictures) on EFOTB(NOT) facebook page, which I agree are very near the knuckle and are in my opinion are in very bad taste.
There have been no posts or messages posted on the EFOTB page as anyone who disagreed with them has already been banned from there.
There has however, been quite a few posts on EFOTB abusing people who disagree with them, and also threats have been made as well. Amanda & Tom have let these posts remain and think it is acceptable.
Screenshots have been taken and I for one have had threats against me, which have been logged with the police and I have a crime number. I have also had numerous posts removed from EFOTB by Facebook, which were aimed at me and were considered harassment and threatening.
So it is a bit rich that the Crawfrauds are accusing others of trolling when they are happy to allow supporters on their page abuse other people. Not to mention Toms, Amanda's and Craigs verbal abuse at the poor young journalist on the Notts Post who reported the story in the first place and Ceylons video calling the girl a crack whore.
You people so desperately need a Bill of Rights, none of this discussion even comes up in the US, where we have a Constitutionally Protected right to shame the stupid.....
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:25 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
The screening of the much anticipated film "The Great British Mortgage Swindle " ( as seem in Cannes film festival ) has been cancelled. Ye Olde Lyer Master Thomas de Crawfrawde was pushing this out on FB a few weeks ago
My guess is they sold so many tickets, the police advised them to cancel and find a bigger venue. I hear there is a downstairs WC in Fearn Chase Nottingham not being used at the moment. Someone may want to pick up all the used tissues first though.
Without the film to push, what is there left for Michael O'Bonkers and Michael O'dear-God to do?
My guess is they sold so many tickets, the police advised them to cancel and find a bigger venue. I hear there is a downstairs WC in Fearn Chase Nottingham not being used at the moment. Someone may want to pick up all the used tissues first though.
Without the film to push, what is there left for Michael O'Bonkers and Michael O'dear-God to do?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:50 pm
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
He better not be thinking of giving up, I want him to fight this all the way. PeaceHercule Parrot wrote:TC seems to be resigned to his defeat now. Nothing left in him but hot air and sour grapes.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Everything was "downstairs" in Fearn Chase, apart from Craig's room that was in the loft.SoLongCeylon wrote:The screening of the much anticipated film "The Great British Mortgage Swindle " ( as seem in Cannes film festival ) has been cancelled. Ye Olde Lyer Master Thomas de Crawfrawde was pushing this out on FB a few weeks ago
My guess is they sold so many tickets, the police advised them to cancel and find a bigger venue. I hear there is a downstairs WC in Fearn Chase Nottingham not being used at the moment. Someone may want to pick up all the used tissues first though.
Without the film to push, what is there left for Michael O'Bonkers and Michael O'dear-God to do?
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.hardcopy wrote:He better not be thinking of giving up, I want him to fight this all the way. PeaceHercule Parrot wrote:TC seems to be resigned to his defeat now. Nothing left in him but hot air and sour grapes.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- Gunners Mate
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:39 pm
- Location: UK
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Stupid Boy?vampireLOREN wrote:
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:18 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Or as he could say to his Daughter "Don't tell 'em your name PIKE!".hobgoblin wrote:Stupid Boy?vampireLOREN wrote:
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.
If people from Poland are called Poles Why are aren't people from Holland called Holes?
-
- Gunners Mate
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:39 pm
- Location: UK
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Doomed.......they're all DOOMED.vampireLOREN wrote:Or as he could say to his Daughter "Don't tell 'em your name PIKE!".hobgoblin wrote:Stupid Boy?vampireLOREN wrote:
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:23 pm
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Erm, wasn't that where the "tissues" were found???vampireLOREN wrote:......
Everything was "downstairs" in Fearn Chase, apart from Craig's room that was in the loft.
Always thought it odd that security guards would come to work for a bit of quick hand relief but then I've never been part of the security guard community.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 810
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:49 am
Re: The Crawfords post eviction liabilities
Did they though?YiamCross wrote: Always thought it odd that security guards would come to work for a bit of quick hand relief but then I've never been part of the security guard community.
I've always had doubts over those stories, especially with the "deposit" found up there.
I mean I have no proof one way or the other but I'm inclined to believe that the average security guard, with access to on-site facilities is less likely to be climbing in to a loft to defecate than a bunch of yobs, holed up in the same loft, for an extended period of time, without access to the same lavatorial facilities.
Who knows though...