PeanutGallery wrote:Almost, I think the horse needs to have a horn though.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/h8Uao3A.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
PeanutGallery wrote:Almost, I think the horse needs to have a horn though.
PeanutGallery wrote:Almost, I think the horse needs to have a horn though.longdog wrote: I think this is the appropriate smilie... :beatinghorse:
Agreed, but I prefer my horn. If my artistic talent could be combined with yours, we'd give Picasso a run for his monet.Forsyth wrote:I think unicorns need to be white though :-)
I have to confess, had some nice person torn up/burnt any papers held by a bank concerning debts owed by me ( back in the day when I had such things) I may not have given them a place to hide......but I would not have rushed to turn them in either. I have visited the Cookson Hills and like the 1930s it is still a farm based economy. Floyd was of that stock , Farmers were hit hardest in the great depression both financially and by the weather..... If any of you read this please do not bother making comparisons to Hitler or those fools that hold our attention today.PeanutGallery wrote:It may be that he burned the mortgages, but his reason for doing so may have not been as clear cut as people might first think. It would certainly be beneficial for a criminal to have any number of 'honest citizens' in his debt and prepared to look the other way should questions be asked in regard to his whereabouts.Yiamcross wrote:I can't find any reference...vampireLOREN wrote: As much as it pains me, she is pretty close to the truth here. Charles Arthur Floyd was no gangster, as much as the FBI would like to paint him as such and yes he took the mortgages and he burnt them. He had the touch of a Robin Hood about him. 150,000...maybe more attended his funeral, his brother was voted Sheriff in their home town for 30 years.
The main difference was he helped farmers who wanted to pay and couldn't . Charles was a thief and a rogue......but a good lad too!.
Hello kids, i'm Inspector Berryman. I'm here with MaGruff the Crime Dog to talk to you about delusional scam artists.NG3 wrote:He's part of the community team, he deals with things like liaising with neighbourhood watch schemes, sending officers in to schools, and humouring strange old men who phone in with silly complaints.Skeleton wrote: That will be Inspector Berryman who seems to be Tom's go to Policeman.
Your house wasn't stolen Tom, that's the f*cking difference.what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner (and my house)
TC seems to be resigned to his defeat now. Nothing left in him but hot air and sour grapes.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
Tom as usual being economic with the truth, the auctioneers were not "informed." Rent-a-mob attended said auction and waited until the Farm came up, then went into rent-a-mob mode and the auction was stopped. The farm was later sold for what many have said was less than it would have realised at auction, rent-a -mobs actions being cited as having scared away potential bidders.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
letissier14 wrote:There has been some posts (mainly pictures) on EFOTB(NOT) facebook page, which I agree are very near the knuckle and are in my opinion are in very bad taste.
There have been no posts or messages posted on the EFOTB page as anyone who disagreed with them has already been banned from there.
There has however, been quite a few posts on EFOTB abusing people who disagree with them, and also threats have been made as well. Amanda & Tom have let these posts remain and think it is acceptable.
Screenshots have been taken and I for one have had threats against me, which have been logged with the police and I have a crime number. I have also had numerous posts removed from EFOTB by Facebook, which were aimed at me and were considered harassment and threatening.
So it is a bit rich that the Crawfrauds are accusing others of trolling when they are happy to allow supporters on their page abuse other people. Not to mention Toms, Amanda's and Craigs verbal abuse at the poor young journalist on the Notts Post who reported the story in the first place and Ceylons video calling the girl a crack whore.
He better not be thinking of giving up, I want him to fight this all the way. PeaceHercule Parrot wrote:TC seems to be resigned to his defeat now. Nothing left in him but hot air and sour grapes.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
Everything was "downstairs" in Fearn Chase, apart from Craig's room that was in the loft.SoLongCeylon wrote:The screening of the much anticipated film "The Great British Mortgage Swindle " ( as seem in Cannes film festival ) has been cancelled. Ye Olde Lyer Master Thomas de Crawfrawde was pushing this out on FB a few weeks ago
My guess is they sold so many tickets, the police advised them to cancel and find a bigger venue. I hear there is a downstairs WC in Fearn Chase Nottingham not being used at the moment. Someone may want to pick up all the used tissues first though.
Without the film to push, what is there left for Michael O'Bonkers and Michael O'dear-God to do?
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.hardcopy wrote:He better not be thinking of giving up, I want him to fight this all the way. PeaceHercule Parrot wrote:TC seems to be resigned to his defeat now. Nothing left in him but hot air and sour grapes.Tom Crawford wrote:With the process of unlawful re-possessions in mind and skipping passed what we know happens in the cases of stolen property's at Land registry, what have we learn't in regards to what protection against fraud we are afforded at the auction houses ? The property's are sold at a knock down price and too whom ? In Paula's Jayne Campbells case the auctioneers were informed that the Farm had been stolen and the auction was halted however it went onto to be sold for a pittance as an internet sale ? what is the difference between a stolen vehicle for instance that can be returned to its rightful owner or a stolen property that cannot ? Why can fraud be seen to be tackled in one but not be seen in the other ?
Stupid Boy?vampireLOREN wrote:
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.
Or as he could say to his Daughter "Don't tell 'em your name PIKE!".hobgoblin wrote:Stupid Boy?vampireLOREN wrote:
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.
Doomed.......they're all DOOMED.vampireLOREN wrote:Or as he could say to his Daughter "Don't tell 'em your name PIKE!".hobgoblin wrote:Stupid Boy?vampireLOREN wrote:
He has taken on a new persona of we shall fight them on the beaches....Home Guard? Dads Army?.
Erm, wasn't that where the "tissues" were found???vampireLOREN wrote:......
Everything was "downstairs" in Fearn Chase, apart from Craig's room that was in the loft.
Did they though?YiamCross wrote: Always thought it odd that security guards would come to work for a bit of quick hand relief but then I've never been part of the security guard community.